Antibodies to neural cell surface and synaptic proteins in paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes.

Among patients with paraneoplastic neurologic syndromes (PNS), emphasis has historically been placed on neural antibodies against intracellular proteins that have a strong association with malignancy. Because of the intracellular location of their antigenic targets, these antibodies are typically considered to be non-pathogenic surrogate markers of immune cell-mediated neural injury. Unfortunately, patients with these antibodies often have suboptimal response to immunotherapy and poor prognosis. Over the last two decades, however, dramatic advancements have been made in the discovery and clinical characterization of neural antibodies against extracellular targets. These antibodies are generally considered to be pathogenic, given their potential to directly alter antigen structure or function, and patients with these antibodies often respond favorably to prompt immunotherapy. These antibodies also associate with tumors and may thus occur as PNS, albeit more variably than neural antibodies against intracellular targets. The updated 2021 PNS diagnostic criteria, which classifies antibodies as high-risk, intermediate-risk, or lower-risk for an associated cancer, better clarifies how neural antibodies against extracellular targets relate to PNS. Using this recently created framework, the clinical presentations, ancillary test findings, oncologic associations, and treatment responses of syndromes associated with these antibodies are discussed.

Optimizing the diagnostic performance of neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

The detection of neural antibodies in patients with paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis has majorly advanced the diagnosis and management of neural antibody-associated diseases. Although testing for these antibodies has historically been restricted to specialized centers, assay commercialization has made this testing available to clinical chemistry laboratories worldwide. This improved test accessibility has led to reduced turnaround time and expedited diagnosis, which are beneficial to patient care. However, as the utilization of these assays has increased, so too has the need to evaluate how they perform in the clinical setting. In this chapter, we discuss assays for neural antibody detection that are in routine use, draw attention to their limitations and provide strategies to help clinicians and laboratorians overcome them, all with the aim of optimizing neural antibody testing for paraneoplastic and autoimmune encephalitis in clinical practice.

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody titers by fixed cell-based assay: positive predictive value and impact of sample collection timing.

Introduction: In January 2023, our laboratory began performing serum myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody (anti-MOG) titers by fixed cell-based assay (CBA). As a quality assurance (QA) assessment, we evaluated titer positive predictive value (PPV) as well as impact of sample collection timing on titers. Methods: Among patients who underwent antibody titers to distinguish between low-positive (<1:100) and clear-positive (≥1:100) anti-MOG, records were reviewed to classify results as true-positive (TP) or false-positive (FP) and facilitate PPV calculation. Timing of sample collection relative to administration of immunotherapy and symptom onset was determined for TP results. Results: Overall PPV of anti-MOG was 70/85 (82%). The PPV of low-positive anti-MOG was significantly lower than clear-positive anti-MOG (72% vs. 95%, p = 0.009). The difference in PPV between low-positive and clear-positive anti-MOG was significant among adults tested, but not children. Among patients with TP anti-MOG, the proportion who received immunotherapy prior to sample collection was significantly higher and median time from symptom onset to sample collection was significantly longer for low-positive compared to clear-positive results. Conclusion: Overall PPV of anti-MOG testing by fixed CBA was reasonably high. The PPV of low-positive anti-MOG was significantly lower than clear-positive anti-MOG. This was driven by the significantly lower PPV of low-positive anti-MOG in adults, possibly reflecting the lower prevalence of MOG antibody-associated disease among adults tested. Timing of sample collection relative to administration of immunotherapy and symptom onset may substantially impact titers, indicating that testing should ideally be performed prior to immunotherapy and close to time of attack.

Exclusion of alternative diagnoses: A component of the 2023 MOGAD criteria that belongs at the forefront, not in the background.

A recent study evaluating the diagnostic performance of the 2023 MOGAD criteria found that it had relatively low specificity. However, this study did not apply the component of these criteria that requires exclusion of alternative diagnoses (item C) when evaluating its performance, raising questions surrounding the relevance of the study's findings to the use of these criteria in routine practice. This correspondence acknowledges the challenge of clinically applying this component of diagnostic criteria, discusses what exclusion of alterative diagnoses actually entails conceptually, and emphasizes the importance of its inclusion in future studies aimed at evaluating the performance of proposed criteria.

Positive predictive value of myositis antibody line blot testing in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Line blot (LB) is in widespread use for myositis antibody detection. Yet, studies of its positive predictive value (PPV) in patients with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM), which would be of particular relevance to neuromuscular clinicians, are lacking. We aimed to determine the PPV of myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM, and examine whether PPV was significantly impacted by intensity of antibody positivity. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent myositis antibody LB testing for suspected IIM between March 2019 and August 2022. RESULTS: Of 70 patients who underwent testing for suspected IIM and had positive myositis antibody LB results, 43 (61%) were female and the median age was 61 years (range: 10-83 years). Forty-four were classified as true-positives, yielding a PPV of 63%. The PPV of patients with weak-positive myositis antibody results (14/30, 47%) was significantly lower than the PPV of patients with moderate-positive or strong-positive myositis antibody results (30/40, 75%) (p = .02). DISCUSSION: Our study found that myositis antibody LB testing in patients with suspected IIM had a modest PPV, underscoring the need for antibody interpretation in the context of all available clinical and ancillary test data to avoid misdiagnosis. The significantly lower PPV in patients with weak-positive results emphasizes the particular importance of clinical correlation in such patients. Further study into the diagnostic performance of various LBs for myositis antibody detection is needed to inform their interpretation in clinical practice.

Canadian Consensus Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Autoimmune Encephalitis in Adults.

Autoimmune encephalitis is increasingly recognized as a neurologic cause of acute mental status changes with similar prevalence to infectious encephalitis. Despite rising awareness, approaches to diagnosis remain inconsistent and evidence for optimal treatment is limited. The following Canadian guidelines represent a consensus and evidence (where available) based approach to both the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with autoimmune encephalitis. The guidelines were developed using a modified RAND process and included input from specialists in autoimmune neurology, neuropsychiatry and infectious diseases. These guidelines are targeted at front line clinicians and were created to provide a pragmatic and practical approach to managing such patients in the acute setting.

Evaluating yield and utilization of ganglioside antibody testing in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Ganglioside antibodies can help diagnose distinct acute and chronic inflammatory neuropathies including axonal variants of Guillain-Barre syndrome, Miller-Fisher syndrome (MFS), multifocal motor neuropathy, and chronic sensory ataxic neuropathies. Because ganglioside antibody testing may be routinely ordered in patients with suspected inflammatory neuropathy, we sought to evaluate its yield and utilization in clinical practice. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of all patients at London Health Sciences Centre who underwent ganglioside antibody testing between April 2019 and August 2023. The disease phenotype was determined for each patient, and the proportion of all tests that yielded a true-positive result was calculated. Ganglioside antibody positivity was classified as a true-positive result if the disease phenotype was robustly associated with the detected ganglioside antibody and there was no other more likely diagnosis. RESULTS: We identified 92 patients who underwent ganglioside antibody testing. One patient (1%) was classified as having a true-positive result; this patient had GQ1b-IgG positivity with MFS. Among 92 patients tested, 20 patients (22%) had a disease phenotype that was considered to be robustly associated with ganglioside antibody positivity. CONCLUSIONS: The yield of ganglioside antibody testing in clinical practice is low. We found that this testing is frequently ordered in patients with disease phenotypes that are not robustly associated with ganglioside antibody positivity, indicating that suboptimal test utilization is a primary contributor to its low yield. Restricting ganglioside antibody testing to patients with characteristic disease phenotypes would be valuable to improving yield and utilization of this testing.

Teaching NeuroImage: Unilateral Primary Angiitis of the CNS.

A 48-year-old woman was referred with an 18-year history of focal-onset seizures. She also reported years-long slowly progressive right-sided weakness that was corroborated on examination. Repeated brain MRIs over 15 years showed multifocal left hemispheric T2 fluid-attenuated inversion recovery-hyperintense lesions with patchy enhancement and microhemorrhages, no diffusion restriction, and a left cerebellar infarct (Figure 1, A-F). Only 2 nonspecific white matter lesions were seen contralaterally, indicating largely unihemispheric disease. Differential diagnosis included unilateral primary angiitis of the CNS (PACNS), Rasmussen encephalitis, and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease.1 Serum and CSF testing for autoimmune, infectious, and malignant etiologies and whole-body fluorodeoxyglucose-PET, whole-exome genetic sequencing, and MR vessel-wall imaging were nondiagnostic. Brain biopsy revealed vasculitis (Figure 2, A-F), and the patient was diagnosed with unilateral PACNS. Treatment with mycophenolate mofetil has been initiated. Unilateral PACNS is a rare unihemispheric disease characterized by an indolent course and seizures, recognition of which is critical to accurate diagnosis.1,2.

Looking Beyond Syndrome-Based Criteria for Autoimmune Encephalitis-The Need for Complementary Neural Antibody-Based Diagnostic Criteria.

This Viewpoint discusses how neural antibody­based diagnostic criteria for autoimmune encephalitis would complement the syndrome-based diagnostic algorithm to improve sensitivity while maintaining high specificity.

Non-demyelinating disorders mimicking and misdiagnosed as NMOSD: a literature review.

BACKGROUND: Differentiating neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) from its mimics is crucial to avoid misdiagnosis, especially in the absence of aquaporin-4-IgG. While multiple sclerosis (MS) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG associated disease (MOGAD) represent major and well-defined differential diagnoses, non-demyelinating NMOSD mimics remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review on PubMed/MEDLINE to identify reports of patients with non-demyelinating disorders that mimicked or were misdiagnosed as NMOSD. Three novel cases seen at the authors' institutions were also included. The characteristics of NMOSD mimics were analyzed and red flags associated with misdiagnosis identified. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients were included; 35 (52%) were female. Median age at symptoms onset was 44 (range, 1-78) years. Fifty-six (82%) patients did not fulfil the 2015 NMOSD diagnostic criteria. The clinical syndromes misinterpreted for NMOSD were myelopathy (41%), myelopathy + optic neuropathy (41%), optic neuropathy (6%), or other (12%). Alternative etiologies included genetic/metabolic disorders, neoplasms, infections, vascular disorders, spondylosis, and other immune-mediated disorders. Common red flags associated with misdiagnosis were lack of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) pleocytosis (57%), lack of response to immunotherapy (55%), progressive disease course (54%), and lack of magnetic resonance imaging gadolinium enhancement (31%). Aquaporin-4-IgG positivity was detected in five patients by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (n = 2), cell-based assay (n = 2: serum, 1; CSF, 1), and non-specified assay (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The spectrum of NMOSD mimics is broad. Misdiagnosis frequently results from incorrect application of diagnostic criteria, in patients with multiple identifiable red flags. False aquaporin-4-IgG positivity, generally from nonspecific testing assays, may rarely contribute to misdiagnosis.